-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Front-Running Detection #239
Comments
This detection logic only applies to the front-running operations of market makers. Assuming that large trade is rare, front-running can be detected by tracking large orders. A pair of metrics, the mode of the hourly percentage of consecutive buy orders and the mode of the hourly percentage of consecutive sell orders, are used as thresholds. With an hourly window, partition the stream by the positions the market maker takes and then aggregate the stream to obtain the following metrics: quantity of buy, quantity of sell, percentage of consecutive buy orders, percentage of consecutive sell orders. If for a single direction, the quantity is substantially high compared to the quantity of the opposite direction and the percentage of consecutive orders of that direction is higher than normal, there is potentially a front-running operation going on. Once a stream is flagged for front-running, it is moved into a cache with its aggregated metrics. The following streams are aggregated and added to the cache until the percentages of consecutive orders of both directions decline to the norm in a stream. When examing the cache, the earlier orders should be dominant in one direction and the later orders in the other direction. |
It takes different forms, but you gave a great example. |
From what I can tell, prevention of Front Running Trades seems as if most prevention is within the ability to analyze the Trades as well as any market maker trades. I think analyzing large trades if those trades are with or against the market, how many of those orders are coming from the same account. You want a code that first tags the accounts with large trades for and against the market, then you would want another filter for market makers, and frequency of trades. In the case of Bitmex, a clear example was provided of how data analytics can at the very least show any risk of a particular company. In regards to the previous, creating a dataset for these companies, policies that allude to foul-play, server issues during high trades, frequency of trades halted due to server issues, when do server issues occur in regards to volatile trades, and so on. Once the key points are nailed down, you can begin to build a key of factors that add risk to the company. I would add one last category that compiles how many flagged risk items there are. Once that is added you would then be able to filter all the companies with a certain amount of Risk items. From there, if no improvements or changes are recommended I would suggest not recommending high risk for front running trade companies, and continually add companies to the list. This way the dataset builds more and more with each company. As a sole person alone, the dataset could be complied and put up somewhere like tableau where data can be verified and added accordingly. This way I’d have more eyes on my work and suggestions to improve this dataset. The more accurate and more ideas are added the more front-running trades we can avoid. Thank you for your time, please provide feedback if possible. Thanks again! |
Usually there is a spread between buy and sell orders, the buy price is lower than the sell price.
|
Front-running relies on a basic condition: clients of the trading platform must receive information with a significant delay. This will give the broker time to process the information and place orders on the exchange.
|
According to my understanding, the essence of front-running is when a market participant from some source learns some information that is likely to influence the market substantially (move market prices in some direction), and buys/sells the asset to benefit from the future price movements that occur once the information becomes widely available. The data on stream of executed trades provided by Binance contains only information on price and volume of individual trades (probably Buyer/Seller order ID’s can be used to infer Buyers/Sellers, but I’m not sure), so we have to use only this information to decide on potential front-running cases. In other words, we need to find some anomalies in the flow of trades that can be considered to be front-running episodes. New significant information becoming publicly available should lead to relatively large price movements (that’s one of the characteristics of “significance”). So, front-running is something that happens shortly before prices move relatively large. To truly benefit from having yet-private information, front-runners deals should probably be larger than "normal" deals. So, we are looking for “unusually large deals happening shortly before prices move unusually large”. In the code I define periods of unusually large price movements as a coincidence of to factors: relatively large on-off price move followed by a period of unchanged prices or prices going in the same direction (to distinguish between a sustained shift in prices and usual volatility). I use the following criteria: 1 period pct_change > some cutoff AND MA_pct_change over next several periods > some cutoff. I use second-long intervals for BTCUSD, but the code can easily be extended for any time domain. Then, for relatively large trades, I look for trade volumes within several seconds (2 in the code, but can be modified) immediately before this unusual price move begins, that are larger than some cutoff In the code (which is just an example using only 10 minutes of data) for cutoffs I use different percentiles of the relevant data (e.g. 0.95 or 0.975 percentiles). |
The challenge is still open. Many of the challenge participants focused on investigative approaches that involved manual analysis of specific cases of front-running. This, however, is an engineering challenge, requiring successful submissions to include an algorithm, supported by references, datasets, graphs, and/or code. We have more than enough of ingenious ideas on how it can be done, but no solid plans of how to implement it using real-time streaming data. |
Im sure people are already doing this but if anyone is so inclined im sure they could create a "honeypot" to either identify and track or potentially deceive people who are attempting. |
Big thanks to all challenge participants! We've honed our methodology & metrics with the help of a brilliant team member hired from the challenge program. |
Investopedia
In the crypto industry, front-running is a common occurrence, with even the biggest trading venues involved. What often starts as an in-house bot to provide additional liquidity to a centralized exchange, sometimes turns in an illegal tool for to earn money by trading ahead of their own customers.
Please comment below with ideas on detecting front-running trades based on a stream of executed trades. More specifically, describe an algorithm you would use to create a metric capable of automatically flagging suspicious trades. Feel free to support your ideas by adding references, datasets, graphs, and code. Comments with the best ideas will be hidden to allow others to participate. Multiple submission awards are available.
Many of the previous challenge participants focused on investigative approaches that involved manual analysis of specific cases of front-running. This, however, is an engineering challenge, requiring successful submissions to include an algorithm, supported by references, datasets, graphs, and/or code. We have more than enough of ingenious ideas on how it can be done, but no solid plans of how to implement it using real-time streaming data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: