Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should polished stone variants etc. be ore base blocks? #8

Open
1holz opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Should polished stone variants etc. be ore base blocks? #8

1holz opened this issue Jul 8, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
discussion Features that likely will be implemented if they recieve enough votes

Comments

@1holz
Copy link
Owner

1holz commented Jul 8, 2020

Should polished stone variants etc. be ore base blocks?

Feature:

Should polished, chiseled stone variants etc. be base blocks for the ore grower?

Optional Alternative:

Only "raw" stone etc. would server as a ore base block.

How voting works:

If you like the feature give THIS comment a thumb up. If you don't like the suggested feature or prefer the alternative over the feature give a thumb down. If you have additional suggestions or something else to say feel free to make a comment on this. After some time the feature will be implemented or discarded. Keep in mind that a feature may also be implemented if it receives more down-votes than up-votes or vise versa. This is only meant for finding out what you think is better the final decision will be made by me.
@1holz 1holz added the discussion Features that likely will be implemented if they recieve enough votes label Jul 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussion Features that likely will be implemented if they recieve enough votes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@1holz