Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Typesync Monorepo support #193

Open
lishaduck opened this issue Aug 8, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #295
Open

Use Typesync Monorepo support #193

lishaduck opened this issue Aug 8, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #295
Assignees
Labels
accepted The issue is accepted and a PR can be proposed. refactor

Comments

@lishaduck
Copy link
Contributor

lishaduck commented Aug 8, 2024

"typesync": "turbo run typesync",

8a01931 updated Typesync to v0.13, but kept the individual scripts. It'd be more efficient to just run it from the root. 🤞 it ought to pick up the packages and do it all concurrently, but without the startup cost of npx+node. And it'd work without needing to be added per-package.

@AndreaPontrandolfo
Copy link
Owner

Does it means we can also have a single .typesyncrc.json at root?

Can you PR this?

@lishaduck
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does it means we can also have a single .typesyncrc.json at root?

Yes.

Can you PR this?

I'll try to get to it sometime.

@AndreaPontrandolfo AndreaPontrandolfo added accepted The issue is accepted and a PR can be proposed. refactor labels Aug 17, 2024
@AndreaPontrandolfo AndreaPontrandolfo self-assigned this Nov 1, 2024
@AndreaPontrandolfo AndreaPontrandolfo linked a pull request Nov 1, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted The issue is accepted and a PR can be proposed. refactor
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants