What's the best model for extracting instrumental only? #444
-
What's the best model for extracting instrumental only? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 9 comments 27 replies
-
MDX-NET UVR-MDX-NET Inst 3 but if you want to get highest quality result you should try using ensemble mode instead (combine results of multiple models together) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For the cleanest possible results for now that pretty much removes all of the vocals with little to no vocal bleed, I use MDX-NET: UVR MDX-NET INST 3 + UVR-MDX-NET Inst Main + 7_HP2-UVR +Demucs: v4 | htdemucs_ft - Shifts: 2 - Ens. Algo.: Avg/Avg Denoise: Off |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
im doing voice overs of a certain show and i want to extract the best instrumental part as possible! im having trouble finding the best ones do u have any ideas by chance? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just need to separate the main instrument of the instrumental track. ( for instance, the lead instruments like guitar, or accordian or harmonica or piano from the instrumental track. Please suggest the Model/s and the processing method. Thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you very much for your explanation. I will try to figure out where in the app i can create this ensemble processing chain
Il 11 ott 2023, 04:13 +0200, Lyssa ***@***.***>, ha scritto:
… > Hi there,
> sorry for my stupid question but I am new here and trying to figure out how it works. When you list the modes you use in your ensemble workflow, you mean that you process the output with a new mode every time, or did you get to apply multiple modes at the same time ?
> thanks
there's an "ensemble mode" and you can select multiple models to run your song through. nowadays I strong suggest you to use the new MDX23C model and place it first in the ensemble (you can download it in the Download Center in UVR)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Este programa é simplismente fantastico, o melhor de todos os tempos, parabens ao criador... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Personally I'd say just download UVR 5 and run it locally; even if you
don't have a good GPU it can run in CPU mode, just takes a little longer.
…On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, 4:52 am COOLak, ***@***.***> wrote:
Do you know for sure that it will finish properly if I buy some credits? I
can't figure if it means uninterrupted work or it can still throw a captcha
mid-process. Or I should buy a VM from them and work on it. The latter is
too technical for me though, haha. On the other hand, don't wanna throw
money in vain.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#444 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB3UVPO2TGTXFGQTFFHLDHDYNV7XRAVCNFSM6AAAAAAVUKH3CCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4DANZQGE2DA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
<Anjok07/ultimatevocalremovergui/repo-discussions/444/comments/8070140@
github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
ive used the settings recommded, but my instrumental track is muffled.. any ideas what i can do? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If anyone's interested in keeping not only instrumentals but also the backup vocals/harmonies, I've used ensemble mode with VR Arc: 5_HP-Karaoke-UVR and VR Arc: 6_HP-Karaoke-UVR. They were titled a little differently when downloading, but they were the only two in the VR Arch dropdown with Karaoke in the title. There are Karaoke downloads in the MDX-Net dropdown but I haven't tried them yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
MDX-NET UVR-MDX-NET Inst 3 but if you want to get highest quality result you should try using ensemble mode instead (combine results of multiple models together)