Best model for isolating dialogues in a film? #605
-
I am using VR-Architecture 1_HP_UVR and it does a good job, but I was wondering if there is another model that is better suited for isolating the vocal dialogues from a film which may have music and sound effects. I have a RTX 4080, so I can run a heavier model if needed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 2 replies
-
I'm not sure if it's the best, but I've been using this ensemble mode reccomended by @sabaasa: MDX-Net: Kim Vocal 1, UVR-MDX-NET inst 3 & UVR-MDX-NET inst main It's done a pretty good job when I've wanted to isolate dialogue from films. Full thread with more infomation here https://github.com/Anjok07/ultimatevocalremovergui/discussions/444#discussioncomment-5313230 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm finding / hearing that MDX-Net models are not GPU accelerated / very slow. Out of interest is this your experience too? This is such a fantastic tool, only just discovered it. I would never have dreamed something could do what this can do, it's like magic. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@codebespawler @marshalleq MDX-Net models aren't utilising the GPU? Do you have any idea why that might be happening? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As a complete aside if you have access to the original 5.1 / 7.1 audio you can basically always grab just the voice by extracting the centre channel track on it's own as nothing else generally gets put in centre channel. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There's a LOT of other stuff in the center channel. Believe me. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I'm not sure if it's the best, but I've been using this ensemble mode reccomended by @sabaasa:
MDX-Net: Kim Vocal 1, UVR-MDX-NET inst 3 & UVR-MDX-NET inst main
Demucs: v4: htdemucs_ft
It's done a pretty good job when I've wanted to isolate dialogue from films.
Full thread with more infomation here https://github.com/Anjok07/ultimatevocalremovergui/discussions/444#discussioncomment-5313230