Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate Ulrichs comments #3

Open
Anniepoo opened this issue Aug 26, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Incorporate Ulrichs comments #3

Anniepoo opened this issue Aug 26, 2013 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Anniepoo
Copy link
Owner

Niftoid - I'll add a note about this version of 'what the heck this is called' to the DCG tut when I get there.

----- Original Message -----
From: Ulrich Neumerkel [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: DCG

Dear Anne!

Back from the WG17 meeting, the name for the terminal
symbols on the left-hand side of a grammar rule were
again discussed.

right-hand context seems to lead to a lot of misunderstandings
for linguists: A grammar rule is commonly presented as
having a right-hand side RHS and a left-hand side LHS:

LHS --> RHS.

Now, the right-hand context appears in the left-hand side
of the grammar rule.

This leads to a bit too much left-right issues.

Therefore, semicontext was agreed upon. It shares with
the previous notion the same non-operational connotation,
it is much shorter, and yet a blank slate.

It is semi, because a real context (in formal languages)
occurs on both sides:

a, "c" --> b, "c".

Here, the letter c is the context. But if it does not
appear in the body, it is not a context. Thus, a
semicontext.

So, maybe you want to use it.

Best regards,
Ulrich

@ghost ghost assigned Anniepoo Aug 26, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant