Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Make "Flow Target" Editable via User Interface #171

Open
paqpal opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Feature Request: Make "Flow Target" Editable via User Interface #171

paqpal opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@paqpal
Copy link

paqpal commented Jan 23, 2025

Hi,

It would be great to have the ability to modify the Flow Target directly through the user interface. Currently, the system only allows viewing the parameters (8-0b, 8-0c, 8-0d) but not editing them.

Benefits:

  • Improved Automations: Enables creating automations that better maintain the ΔT by adjusting the water flow, thus optimizing system performance.
  • Greater Control: Helps maintain a more stable ΔT, increasing system efficiency and reliability.
  • User-Friendly:

Additional Consideration:
It would also be preferable to allow customization of the climate curve in the future. However, this goes beyond the scope of the current request.

Thanks for your attention and the great work!

Paq

@Arnold-n
Copy link
Owner

This is on the to-be-added list but I do not think it is a good idea to change this setting dynamically, because any field setting change requires a Daikin system restart. If you want to change the flow dynamically, you can have a look at intergas_circulation_cap.

@paqpal
Copy link
Author

paqpal commented Jan 24, 2025 via email

@Arnold-n
Copy link
Owner

Thanks - I'll add your Param15 info to the param15 work on the todo-list.

Hybrid systems unfortunately have a fixed 1C overshoot which cannot be increased (actually it is an overshoot of max 1.9C due to rounding).

Defrosting has my attention, as the hybrid systems have problems with it, though I am more concerned about the unit not defrosting when it is needed giving COPs down to 1.2. Requesting a defrost manually is already implemented as a HA button. Extending a defrost can only be done by timely off/on switching; not sure whether the cost of that is really less than accepting it. Newer full-electric systems have much better defrosting timing.

@paqpal
Copy link
Author

paqpal commented Jan 24, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants