this is a bootstrapped document that will update frequently in the next few months as we lay the groundwork for the operations of the TAG. Now onto the show...:
🛬Thanks for landing here! There's a good chance you want to help the contributor side of the code in one of our working groups, get involved on a regular basis, or simply be curious, no matter your reason, we are excited to have you.
This TAG (Technical Advisory Group) is an extension of the TOC that works to build programs and guidance to help scale and grow open source communities. We work in this GitHub repository:
🆕cncf/tag-contributor-strategy
contains our meta docs that cover our governance, how we operate, and resources that we
collect along the way. The website/content directory contains the source for the
web pages at contribute.cncf.io/maintainers and is advice for people who
are running and maintaining CNCF projects.
Note: Project data listed in the Contributors section is pulled from the CNCF landscape. Submit a PR to the landscape repo to update any project data.
Our charter describes our mission and initial scope of what we’d like to accomplish. Each of our members are closely involved with at least one CNCF project; we are here to learn as much as those we serve.
Read our contributing guide for details on how to contribute content for contribute.cncf.io.
We very much welcome everyone on any of our communication channels including through GitHub Issues and Pull Requests (PRs) and ask all contributors to maintain our welcoming culture. We follow the CNCF’s code of conduct.
Async communication is our preference because of our global nature but absolutely value face to face time and meetings when it makes sense. Slack works well for real time questions and discussion but we will move decisions and key tasks to GitHub or the mailing list. See our full list of communication channels.
We don’t sponsor specific company branded documentation and resources as official guidance to contributors and/or projects. A resources list[link tbu] that may link to other sources that are not official, including company branded information, in the strategy repo, is strictly for our groups planning purposes only.
Licensing is important to open source projects. It provides some assurances that the software will continue to be available based under the terms that the author(s) desired. We require that contributors sign off on commits submitted to our project's repositories. The Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) is a way to certify that you wrote and have the right to contribute the code you are submitting to the project.
You sign-off by adding the following to your commit messages. Your sign-off must match the git user and email associated with the commit.
This is my commit message
Signed-off-by: Your Name <[email protected]>
Git has a -s command line option to do this automatically:
git commit -s -m 'This is my commit message'
If you forgot to do this and have not yet pushed your changes to the remote repository, you can amend your commit with the sign-off by running
git commit --amend -s
Contributors and/or Maintainers of a CNCF incubated or graduated project:
- Be a liaison for your project with our group
- Why? The ecosystem is very large, if you stay connected, you’ll be closer to resources and advice.
- Take back this information to build (or continue to build!) intentional community and governance spaces and/or roles in your project to do this work at an operational level
- Have questions? Drop in on a meeting, either the main TAG meeting or the relevant working group meeting. This is your time to ask us general or specific questions that can give you ideas, unblock you, or help with strategy around TOC graduation or incubation project criteria.
- Give us feedback on where you need help, guidance, requested templates,
recommendations, and more here
- Or you can provide feedback by filing issues against the cncf/tag-contributor-strategy repo, send a note to the mailing list, or find a chair or working group facilitator privately on slack.
- Become a contributor in one of our working groups
- File issues and PRs
- Project management
- Create workshops, talks, blogs, and papers on related contributor content (or reuse the good stuff you have!)
- Create templates and other scalable guidance
- Tell us what WORKS! Sounds like a lot of “what doesn’t work” above but we also want to know what works well for projects in their contributor and governance areas. Looking at you graduated projects but we see the incubation project crew still working on great programs!
- Be a part of our work in progress maintainers circle!
Academics and open source enthusiasts that have completed research (or underway!) , studied, and/or created programs for other ecosystems, we would love to hear from you, too! Similar deal as above - watch out for our Issues, come hang out in slack, or we'll see you at a meeting!
//TODO add in comments about how to label once we figure that out
-
Talk to us via GitHub issue, mailing list, or meeting before you start on major work. If it’s typos and fixes to docs, please submit. 😀
-
Tap one of the chairs or working group facilitators in slack if you haven’t heard from us in 5 days.
-
If this is a change that you intend to work on iteratively over multiple pull requests before it is ready to go live, please make the pull request against the drafts branch. When you are ready for the TOC to review your final changes, submit a pull request with your changes to the main branch.
This makes it easier to collaborate on change sets with multiple people. You can preview changes made on the drafts branch at https://drafts--cncf-contribute.netlify.app
-
When making changes to your PR, put them into a new commit (instead of rebasing or amending) so that it's easier for reviewers to see just your new changes.
-
We will give you an opportunity to clean up your commits before merging or can squash them for you.
-
If a member asks you to "rebase" your PR, they're saying that a lot of docs/code has changed, and that you need to update your branch to incorporate the latest changes from main before we can merge your PR. You can use whatever you are comfortable with, either merging main into your branch or rebasing your branch on main.
- We leave pull requests open for at least 48 hours, so that others have the
chance to review/comment except in cases of the following:
- The majority of contributors in that working group have already reviewed
- Something urgent or small operational document change like a meeting time
- Spelling or grammar fixes
Open source communities use many different tools. If this is your first experience with GitHub - yay! There are a ton of great resources out there to educate on the UI and standard workflows. Everyone has been a beginner at some point; always feel free to ask for help. You can absolutely use the GitHub UI vs command line if that works best for your workflow.
https://www.firsttimersonly.com/ //TODO add more resources