From 82d53806d6547dc4fda5e695879e418ff1b08ca1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazunari001 <130190029+Kazunari001@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 11:41:23 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] reason:fix the documents (#267)
---
.../Cdr.Banking/Cdr.Banking.Business/ExecutionContext.cs | 2 +-
samples/Cdr.Banking/README.md | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/Cdr.Banking/Cdr.Banking.Business/ExecutionContext.cs b/samples/Cdr.Banking/Cdr.Banking.Business/ExecutionContext.cs
index dfa31dbc6..ea3f675b6 100644
--- a/samples/Cdr.Banking/Cdr.Banking.Business/ExecutionContext.cs
+++ b/samples/Cdr.Banking/Cdr.Banking.Business/ExecutionContext.cs
@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@ public class ExecutionContext : CoreEx.ExecutionContext
///
/// Gets the list of account (identifiers) that the user has access/permission to.
///
- public List Accounts { get; } = new();
+ public List Accounts { get; } = [];
}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/samples/Cdr.Banking/README.md b/samples/Cdr.Banking/README.md
index a377e3f23..c31870afd 100644
--- a/samples/Cdr.Banking/README.md
+++ b/samples/Cdr.Banking/README.md
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ public class ExecutionContext : CoreEx.ExecutionContext
///
/// Gets the list of account (identifiers) that the user has access/permission to.
///
- public List Accounts { get; } = new();
+ public List Accounts { get; } = [];
}
```
@@ -212,10 +212,10 @@ In this case, we are setting this using the code-generation for the operation. T
# Data access will be auto-implemented for Cosmos as defined for the entity.
# Cosmos PartitionKey will be set to the accountId parameter value for data access.
#
-{ name: GetTransactions, text: Get transaction for account, type: GetColl, webApiRoute: '{accountId}/ransactions', paging: true, cosmosPartitionKey: accountId,
+{ name: GetTransactions, text: Get transaction for account, type: GetColl, webApiRoute: '{accountId}/transactions', paging: true, cosmosPartitionKey: accountId,
parameters: [
# Note usage of ValidatorCode which will inject the code as-is into the validation logic; being a common validator 'Validators.Account' that will perform the authorization check.
- { name: AccountId, type: string, validatorCode: Common(Validators.AccountId), webApiFrom: romRoute, isMandatory: true },
+ { name: AccountId, type: string, validatorCode: Common(Validators.AccountId), webApiFrom: FromRoute, isMandatory: true },
{ name: Args, type: TransactionArgs, validator: TransactionArgsValidator }
]
}