managed-csi or managed-csi-premium storage class for PVCs? #2784
dev-samples
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have deployed k8s 1.22 in azure and I see the following storage classes:
I am trying to decide which storage class to use for my CI/jenkins containers (running intensive IO disk operations, lots of read/writes of small files).
I don't need to be able to resize existing disks.
Based on:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/azure-disk-csi#dynamically-create-azure-disk-pvs-by-using-the-built-in-storage-classes
Looks like the candidates are:
and that both are SSD.
Does selecting managed-csi-premium over managed-csi just mean I get better redundancy of the data? Or are there also better IO performance, attach/detach time for managed-csi-premium?
Also seems to be that managed-premium and managed-csi-premium are identical except for a few parameters? So are managed-premium just kept for backward compatibility?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions