Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Feature] APIM as a multi-tenant GenAI gateway #142

Open
sushaanttb opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[New Feature] APIM as a multi-tenant GenAI gateway #142

sushaanttb opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@sushaanttb
Copy link
Contributor

sushaanttb commented Jan 10, 2025

What?
A new scenario/capability to demonstrate a pattern of using APIM as a multi-tenant GenAI gateway.

Why?
With the rapid advancement in LLMs/GenAI , more & more organizations which operate in a SaaS model are now looking to build a GenAI gateway system with multi-tenancy as a key feature of their system.

For example -

  1. Exposing LLM APIs based on different tiers of customers - premium (most premium models), shared, freemium (basic capacity models)
  2. Controlling access of LLM APIs, for example giving access to Image APIs only or Chat APIs only, to specific customers.

We recently worked on this scenario for a customer and accordingly identified this pattern which is now being used in Production and also afterwards we received similar requirement from another customer, and they are looking for exact same solution.

We already have written a blog post around it -
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/ise/multitenant-genai-gateway-using-apim/

Having this scenario as part of this accelerator along with the respective code samples, would be a great reference/starting point for consumers having similar requirement, saving their time and effort and also resulting in a more effective adoption of APIM as well.

@sushaanttb sushaanttb changed the title [New Scenario] APIM as a multi-tenant GenAI gateway [New Feature] APIM as a multi-tenant GenAI gateway Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant