[BUG] azure-storage-blob 12.29.0 is giving issue in the azure for copying file while working correctly with azure-storage-blob 12.14.0

[dheerajgupta217]

Describe the bug
[BUG] azure-storage-blob 12.29.0 is giving issue in the azure for copying file while working correctly with azure-storage-blob 12.14.0

Exception or Stack Trace

Result: Failure Exception: NoSuchMethodError: io.netty.handler.codec.DefaultHeadersImpl.(Lio/netty/util/HashingStrategy;Lio/netty/handler/codec/ValueConverter;Lio/netty/handler/codec/DefaultHeaders$NameValidator;ILio/netty/handler/codec/DefaultHeaders$ValueValidator;)V Stack: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.broker.JavaMethodInvokeInfo.invoke(JavaMethodInvokeInfo.java:22) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.broker.JavaMethodExecutorImpl.execute(JavaMethodExecutorImpl.java:22) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.chain.FunctionExecutionMiddleware.invoke(FunctionExecutionMiddleware.java:19) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.chain.InvocationChain.doNext(InvocationChain.java:21) at com.microsoft.durabletask.azurefunctions.internal.middleware.OrchestrationMiddleware.invoke(OrchestrationMiddleware.java:29) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.chain.InvocationChain.doNext(InvocationChain.java:21) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.broker.JavaFunctionBroker.invokeMethod(JavaFunctionBroker.java:125) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.handler.InvocationRequestHandler.execute(InvocationRequestHandler.java:34) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.handler.InvocationRequestHandler.execute(InvocationRequestHandler.java:10) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.handler.MessageHandler.handle(MessageHandler.java:44) at com.microsoft.azure.functions.worker.JavaWorkerClient$StreamingMessagePeer.lambda$onNext$0(JavaWorkerClient.java:94) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750) Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: io.netty.handler.codec.DefaultHeadersImpl.(Lio/netty/util/HashingStrategy;Lio/netty/handler/codec/ValueConverter;Lio/netty/handler/codec/DefaultHeaders$NameValidator;ILio/netty/handler/codec/DefaultHeaders$ValueValidator;)V at io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpHeaders.(DefaultHttpHeaders.java:86) at io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpHeaders.(DefaultHttpHeaders.java:77) at io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpHeaders.(DefaultHttpHeaders.java:61) at reactor.netty.http.client.HttpClientConfig.(HttpClientConfig.java:332) at reactor.netty.http.client.HttpClientConnect.(HttpClientConnect.java:85) at reactor.netty.http.client.HttpClient.create(HttpClient.java:393) at com.azure.core.http.netty.NettyAsyncHttpClientBuilder.build(NettyAsyncHttpClientBuilder.java:119) at com.azure.core.http.netty.NettyAsyncHttpClientProvider.createInstance(NettyAsyncHttpClientProvider.java:18) at com.azure.core.implementation.http.HttpClientProviders.createInstance(HttpClientProviders.java:58) at com.azure.core.http.HttpClient.createDefault(HttpClient.java:50) at com.azure.core.http.HttpClient.createDefault(HttpClient.java:40) at com.azure.core.http.HttpPipelineBuilder.build(HttpPipelineBuilder.java:62) at com.azure.storage.blob.implementation.util.BuilderHelper.buildPipeline(BuilderHelper.java:135) at com.azure.storage.blob.BlobServiceClientBuilder.buildAsyncClient(BlobServiceClientBuilder.java:112) at com.azure.storage.blob.BlobServiceClientBuilder.buildClient(BlobServiceClientBuilder.java:93)

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Setup (please complete the following information):

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

Information Checklist
Kindly make sure that you have added all the following information above and checkoff the required fields otherwise we will treat the issuer as an incomplete report

• Bug Description Added
• Repro Steps Added
• Setup information Added

[alzimmermsft]

Thank you for filing this issue @dheerajgupta217.

This issue is from a dependency diamond happening somewhere in your application / in the Azure Functions environment.

azure-storage-blob:12.14.0 used Netty 4.1.67.Final and Reactor Netty 1.0.10 as the default HTTP stack, azure-storage-blob:12.29.0 uses Netty 4.1.112.Final and Reactor Netty 1.0.48. At some point between those versions of Netty and Reactor Netty a new constructor for DefaultHeadersImpl was added (DefaultHeadersImpl(HashingStrategy, ValueConverter, NameValidation, int, ValueValidator)) and started to be used.

DefaultHeadersImpl is defined in netty-codec while the usage of it from within code used the azure-storage-blob is in netty-codec-http, so this is where I'd start looking for a dependency conflict. Or, in short, the Netty dependencies in the application running aren't aligned.

Since Netty is being used, the Azure SDKs should have a log message about dependencies found on the classpath. This log should be produced by NettyUtility in our azure-core-http-netty package:

https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/blob/main/sdk/core/azure-core-http-netty/src/main/java/com/azure/core/http/netty/implementation/NettyUtility.java#L95

For this, you'll need to have INFO level logging enabled for that class.

[github-actions]

Hi @dheerajgupta217. Thank you for opening this issue and giving us the opportunity to assist. We believe that this has been addressed. If you feel that further discussion is needed, please add a comment with the text "/unresolve" to remove the "issue-addressed" label and continue the conversation.

[dheerajTesco]

/unresolve

[github-actions]

Hi $dheerajTesco, only the original author of the issue can ask that it be unresolved. Please open a new issue with your scenario and details if you would like to discuss this topic with the team.

[dheerajgupta217]

/unresolve

[github-actions]

Hi @dheerajgupta217. Thank you for opening this issue and giving us the opportunity to assist. To help our team better understand your issue and the details of your scenario please provide a response to the question asked above or the information requested above. This will help us more accurately address your issue.

[alzimmermsft]

@dheerajgupta217 I see you unresolved the issue, was there any additional information you needed to troubleshoot from your side?