You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note the type="unit" here - most other catalogues I've inspected have the more sensible type="upgrade" here. For example, Lumineth Realmlords and Idoneth Deepkin
I would expect all datasets to have a consistent schema and treat concepts in a constant way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your expectation is unfortunately nowhere near met - there is currently a fairly large lack of consistency in general in the implementation. I would like to completely redo the system from scratch, but would like to wait until 4e in case we get indexed like 40k. I'll change this one bc it's a 5 sec fix, but in general schema issues that aren't causing problems aren't going to be touched until then.
The data file for the Stormcast Eternals faction has the following entry for the Allegiance selection:
<selectionEntry id="c6a3-2acf-1e46-3896" name="Allegiance" hidden="false" collective="false" import="true" type="unit">
Note the
type="unit"
here - most other catalogues I've inspected have the more sensibletype="upgrade"
here. For example, Lumineth Realmlords and Idoneth DeepkinI would expect all datasets to have a consistent schema and treat concepts in a constant way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: