You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current behavior is entirely correct, but it doesn't let me compare alignments that have matching against those that don't. I propose a new function
remove_match_ops(::T) where {T<:Union{String,Alignment,AlignedSequence,PairwiseAlignment,PairwiseAlignmentResult}}
that would remove the = (sequence match) and X (sequence mismatch) operations from the CIGAR of the alignment and return a T where those operations would be replaced by M (match) operations and adjacent match operations merged.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Expected Behavior
I would like a way to tell if the two alignments are the same regardless of sequence, such that
Current Behavior
☝️ This behavior is correct!
Possible Solution / Implementation
The current behavior is entirely correct, but it doesn't let me compare alignments that have matching against those that don't. I propose a new function
that would remove the
=
(sequence match) andX
(sequence mismatch) operations from the CIGAR of the alignment and return aT
where those operations would be replaced byM
(match) operations and adjacent match operations merged.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: