Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BRAF V600E mutation why turn into V640E mutaion in TCGA COAD cohort? #624

Open
LULUCHIU opened this issue Mar 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@LULUCHIU
Copy link

From the publication worldwide shows that BRAF V600E is most common point mutation, but recently I worked on the TCGA dataset, all V600E were converted to V640E which is so different from the data in the past.

@asmlgkj
Copy link

asmlgkj commented Apr 15, 2024

it maybe the reason of the GDC data, I found gdc also were V640E @LULUCHIU

@bryanjjones
Copy link

I just came across this issue. It depends on which isoform or splice variant you use for numbering. If you use isoform 1 or 2 (NP_004324.2 or NP_001341538.1), that amino acid ends up being number 600. If you use isoform 3 or 4 for numbering (NP_001361173.1 or NP_001361187.1), the amino acid is in position 640.

@mschubert
Copy link

mschubert commented Aug 14, 2024

Related: #516

The annotation at position 640 is now also the canonical transcript in Ensembl, so this should be the "correct" name

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants