You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a fundamental problem as the ingoing solution is hard to compute accurately at large radius. It may be possible to improve the accuracy by using a different MST representation.
The ingoing solution for the ReggeWheelerRadial function struggles at very large radii.
For Example:
[omega]=N[Sqrt[1/100^3], 32]
ReggeWheelerRadial[2, 2,[omega]][[1]][100000]
and
[omega]=N[Sqrt[1/10^3], 32]
ReggeWheelerRadial[2, 2,[omega] ][[1]][10000]
both fail, producing an error similar to:
-0.*10^254 + 0.*10^254 I
However with greatly increased precision, ceases to produce an error.
For Example:
[omega]=N[Sqrt[1/100^3], 100]
ReggeWheelerRadial[2, 2,[omega]][[1]][100000]
will produce a numerical answer with only a few significant figures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: