Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
A value like "CSTM-00" would be very useful here. Could we have something similar for service codes? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Bumping this thread, any thoughts @shaselton? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Service_code is not a required node, so when the rate applies to all POS or
in case where the rate is not dependent on POS then we are ignoring this
node.
…On Mon, 9 May 2022, 22:22 brbucher, ***@***.***> wrote:
Bumping this thread, any thoughts @shaselton
<https://github.com/shaselton>?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#386 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIJ2FFLPLQGMLWREBUUPBTDVJE7F7ANCNFSM5OZIYXGA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: <CMSgov/price-transparency-guide/repo-discussions/386/comments/2716270
@github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
My bad, you are right. For professional we are listing down all POS in the
array.
…On Mon, 9 May 2022, 23:48 brbucher, ***@***.***> wrote:
https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide/tree/master/schemas/in-network-rates#negotiated-price-object
Service code is required when the billing class is professional, but we
are following the same approach for institutional.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#386 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIJ2FFIKYZ6WGFYDEBNNB4LVJFJEVANCNFSM5OZIYXGA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
<CMSgov/price-transparency-guide/repo-discussions/386/comments/2716754@
github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
What is the expected output when all place of service codes are applicable?
There are a few mentions of this in the overall POS discussion here: #63
Would the expectation be that each POS type is listed out individually or would an empty array or "All" denotation be possible?
Allowing for empty arrays or "All" could save a significant amount of space in the files.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions