Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EDA Checkpoint Feedback #4

Open
ShanEllis opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

EDA Checkpoint Feedback #4

ShanEllis opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@ShanEllis
Copy link
Contributor

ShanEllis commented Mar 12, 2024

EDA Checkpoint Feedback

Score (out of 5 pts)

Score = 5

EDA Checkpoint Feedback

Quality Reasons
EDA Relevance P
EDA Analysis and Description D Elaborate on what the figures mean. You state what you plotted but not what you learned - should guide viewer as to what is to be learned.
EDA Figures P Try to make the legend colors for male and female students consistent throughout. Also, adjust the font size for the ticks of the figures.

Comments

Regrade Feedback

From the EDA checkpoint, it seems like the NaNs were still in the datasets.

Rubric

Unsatisfactory Developing Proficient Excellent
EDA relevance EDA is mostly neither relevant to the question nor helpful in figuring out how to address the question. Or the EDA does address the question, but many obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included. EDA does not include explore distributions of single variables or relationships between variables or both EDA is partly irrelevant/unhelpful. Or some obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included. EDA does not include a few distributions of single variables or relationships between variables EDA is almost all relevant / helpful in addressing the question. No obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included. Thorough EDA addressed all aspects that are relevant to the question
EDA analysis and description Many of the analyses are poor choices (e.g., using means instead of medians for obviously skewed data), or are poorly described in the text, or do not aid understanding the data Some of the analyses are poor choices, or are poorly described in the text, or do not aid understanding the data All analyses are correct choices. Only one or two have minor issues in the text descriptions supporting them. Mostly they fit well with other elements of the EDA and support understanding the data All analyses are correct choices with clear text descriptions supporting them. The figures fit well with the other elements of the EDA, producing a clear understanding of the data.
EDA figures Many of the figures are poor plot choices (e.g., using a bar plot to represent a time series where it would be better to use a line plot) or have poor aesthetics (including colormap, data point shape/color, axis labels, titles, annotations, text legibility) or do not aid understanding the data Some of the figures are poor plot choices or have poor aesthetics. Some figures do not aid understanding the data All figures are correct plot choices. Only one or two have minor questionable aesthetic choices. The figures mostly fit well with the other elements of the EDA and support understanding the data All figures are correct plot choices with beautiful aesthetics. The figures fit well with the other elements of the EDA, producing a clear understanding of the data.

Grading Rules

Scoring: Out of 5 points

Each Developing => -1 pts
Each Unsatisfactory=> -2 pts
until the score is 0

If students address the detailed feedback in a future checkpoint they will earn these points back

DETAILED FEEDBACK should be left in the data section AND anywhere the student addressed proposal feedback but did not do it to your satisfaction

@qzzz11
Copy link
Collaborator

qzzz11 commented Mar 21, 2024

EDA Analysis and Description: According to the feedback, we add more interpretation of the graph to guide the reader.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants