TDS Temporary Stability Simulation Problem in Different Boot States #528
-
Hello, I am using Andes simulation to simulate the frequency changes of the system under load disturbances in the IEEE-39 system example. Under the same disturbance, I set different generator connection states to simulate different startup methods. But I found that under certain disturbances (with a magnitude of 20% of the total load), TDS simulation will crash when all units are turned on, while TDS simulation can proceed normally when some units are turned on. This indicates that the system can withstand disturbances of 20% load. However, compared to common sense, this is contrary because when all units are turned on, their inertia is more abundant and their primary frequency regulation ability is stronger, but the simulation process is not like this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 13 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not sure about the cause, but I'm with you on common sense. When a dynamic generator does not take the place of a static one, the static PV generator remains to impose the fixed P and V. I'll look into this to rule out software bugs. About the spike in frequency: all the frequencies obtained by BusFreq are estimates, since the network is based on steady-state phasor. You can adjust the time-constant for the washout filter to smooth it out. Alternatively, you can fetch the rotor speed at the generators as the frequency, but that's limited to the buses with generators. Milano's Frequency Divider provides a formula to distribute generator frequency to non-generator buses. It has yet to be implemented in ANDES. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As a supplement regarding the spike, here is a relevant discussion that shows how the parameters can impact the measured variables, #476 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The PV node should have been turned off automatically, if the GENROU model is specified in the case file and has u=1. This is done in the initialization process by calling v_numeric of GENROU.
If you turn off GENROU by custom code, PV will not turn off.
Did the problem get solved?
Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
…________________________________
From: Crazy-Bike ***@***.***>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 11:51:09 AM
To: CURENT/andes ***@***.***>
Cc: Hantao Cui ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [CURENT/andes] TDS Temporary Stability Simulation Problem in Different Boot States (Discussion #528)
Thank you for your answer, Mr. Cui! I think the issue with the boot mode and TDS may be caused by the PV node. Because when changing the connection state u of the GENRU model, the connection state u of the PV nodes connected by GENRU did not change accordingly, resulting in normal results when calculating power flow based on PV nodes; But an error occurred during TDS.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#528 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABSNZAZDGTT37B3WAIFSCSLY5AGH3AVCNFSM6AAAAABGCA3JLKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TAOJYGM4TM>.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Check follow documentation for more details about replacing a static generator with a dynamic generator, https://docs.andes.app/en/latest/groupdoc/StaticGen.html#staticgen @cuihantao Hantao, is it allowed to change the device connection status |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I'm not sure about the cause, but I'm with you on common sense. When a dynamic generator does not take the place of a static one, the static PV generator remains to impose the fixed P and V.
I'll look into this to rule out software bugs.
About the spike in frequency: all the frequencies obtained by BusFreq are estimates, since the network is based on steady-state phasor. You can adjust the time-…