You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The three state-specific schemas currently test that email addresses match the pattern "^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)\.([a-zA-Z]{2,5})$". That will present problems for addresses with some of the newer top-level domains (eg, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains#ICANN-era_generic_top-level_domains). What, if anything, should we use as an upper-bound on the length of the TLD?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The three state-specific schemas currently test that email addresses match the pattern "^([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)\.([a-zA-Z]{2,5})$". That will present problems for addresses with some of the newer top-level domains (eg, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains#ICANN-era_generic_top-level_domains). What, if anything, should we use as an upper-bound on the length of the TLD?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: