You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I passed my dataset through SQANTI3 using ML option to filter the isoforms. I also filtered isoform and gtf files.
In the output files after the sqanti filter step, MLresult_classification.txt file has 52700 true isoforms (Intra-priming= FALSE, filter result= Isoform) and the inclusive.txt file also had the same number of isoforms. But the filtered isoform file (filtered.fasta) has 52,553 isoforms and there is 148 difference in number.
I would like to know possible reasons for this and is there an explanation to get such number difference in isoform number?
Many thanks,
Upendra.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the fasta file also, I have same ID for more than one isoform without the "duplicate number" in the renaming. But they have different lengths. And total number of transcripts in the fasta file is 52,553.
Hi,
I passed my dataset through SQANTI3 using ML option to filter the isoforms. I also filtered isoform and gtf files.
In the output files after the sqanti filter step, MLresult_classification.txt file has 52700 true isoforms (Intra-priming= FALSE, filter result= Isoform) and the inclusive.txt file also had the same number of isoforms. But the filtered isoform file (filtered.fasta) has 52,553 isoforms and there is 148 difference in number.
I would like to know possible reasons for this and is there an explanation to get such number difference in isoform number?
Many thanks,
Upendra.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: