Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BAM/SAM input option #274

Open
carolinamonzo opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 Discussed in #273 · 1 comment
Open

BAM/SAM input option #274

carolinamonzo opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 Discussed in #273 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@carolinamonzo
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed in #273

Originally posted by apollo994 March 21, 2024
Hello SQANTI team,

I've started using SQANTI3 to directly evaluate reads instead of gene models. This is a really helpful feature when comparing two sequencing runs/technologies and you want to avoid the bias from the transcript model construction algorithm. In this context, it would be helpful to have an option to input an alignment file directly. This would skip the time/resource consuming step that, in many cases, has already been done in previous steps.

Thanks a lot for sharing and maintaining this project!

@carolinamonzo carolinamonzo added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 21, 2024
@carolinamonzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @apollo994! We agree, it's something that we have in mind but haven't had the time to implement it yet. However, you can give a GFF to SQANTI instead of starting from scratch and having to construct transcript models.

What you can do is use the spliced_bam2gff tool from Nanopore to transform your bam to GFF (careful with the -t option, it is a reported issue in the tool's repository that instead of corresponding to threads, it's a threshold of to classify all deletions larger than the value as introns). And then run SQANTI on the GFF of your reads.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants