Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace the SSH class by a Python library? #7026

Open
aldbr opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #7703
Open

Replace the SSH class by a Python library? #7026

aldbr opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #7703
Assignees
@aldbr

Comments

@aldbr
Copy link
Contributor

aldbr commented May 19, 2023

As explained in #7025, the _ssh_call() method does not seem to work perfectly.
There exist a few popular python libraries to perform SSH operations like Fabric (Paramiko) (https://docs.fabfile.org/en/stable/).

We could investigate the possibility of using one of them instead of relying on our SSH class to perform remote operations over SSH.
@aldbr aldbr self-assigned this May 19, 2023
@atsareg
Copy link
Contributor

atsareg commented May 26, 2023

At the moment the SSH class was written, as far as I remember, the Paramiko was considered but was rejected as not applicable. This was very long ago and may be the situation changed. So, this can be all reviewed. Also some use cases are probably no more relevant, e.g. using gsissh instead of ssh or tunneling to another ssh login.

@aldbr aldbr linked a pull request Jul 3, 2024 that will close this issue
[9.0] feat(Resources): introduce fabric in SSHCE #7703
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@aldbr aldbr

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

[9.0] feat(Resources): introduce fabric in SSHCE aldbr/DIRAC
2 participants
@atsareg @aldbr