You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
In the 'certified' function of the CertifierHbbft contract, there is a redundant check that unnecessarily complicates the code and may lead to confusion. The function first checks if 'stakingAddress == address(0)' and returns false if so. However, it then always returns 'stakingAddress != address(0)', which is essentially the inverse of the first check. This redundancy does not affect the functionality but reduces code clarity and efficiency.
Recommendation:
Simplify the 'certified' function by removing the redundant check. The function can be rewritten as follows:
Likelihood: High
Description
In the 'certified' function of the CertifierHbbft contract, there is a redundant check that unnecessarily complicates the code and may lead to confusion. The function first checks if 'stakingAddress == address(0)' and returns false if so. However, it then always returns 'stakingAddress != address(0)', which is essentially the inverse of the first check. This redundancy does not affect the functionality but reduces code clarity and efficiency.
Recommendation:
Simplify the 'certified' function by removing the redundant check. The function can be rewritten as follows:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: