Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Suggestion]: Latex compatibility #141

Open
1 of 3 tasks
ivxvm opened this issue Nov 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 3 tasks

[Suggestion]: Latex compatibility #141

ivxvm opened this issue Nov 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ivxvm
Copy link

ivxvm commented Nov 13, 2021

General Info

  • I would like to propose new content
  • I would like to propose changes
  • I would like to propose another thing

Suggestion Description

Currently latex from Thermal Series and Industrial Foregoing are separate liquids. Consider if making them interchangeable in some or all contexts makes sense. For example, this recipe doesn't work with industrialforegoing:latex_bucket. Also, it seems, all Dissolution Chamber recipes only work with latex from Industrial Foregoing.
@ivxvm ivxvm added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 13, 2021
@ValokAsura
Copy link

Sorry if this is a necro, but I just thought I'd mention that this is a great suggestion. I thought that maybe I could figure out how to manually add both versions of latex into the ore dictionary, but I'm afraid I don't have the intelligence at the moment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ValokAsura @ivxvm