-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a new 3DCrowd compatible laser cut headband design based on the DoES design #70
Comments
Assuming International Standard 4 Hole Punch this applies
|
I don't quite know where all those numbers come from in the DoES design but I reckon I just need to change the top centre 86 to a 64 or thereabouts and that'll do it. |
3DCrowd have informed me they want to put the DoES design through CE approval @afroleft @amcewen. For this to happen we'll need to fit to their Prusa based visor shield. I will follow up on liability in another thread but current best advice is we must have CE approval whether we sell or give away splash visors and whatever we call them. |
If 3DCrowd have the budget (estimate from Dave Kershaw of £10k-£50k) and admin capacity to put the design through CE marking, that's a great opportunity to take liability off DoES. Would probably require input from @amcewen and others involved on design process, iterations and documenting needs of the healthcare people spoken to during design stage - not a small task. |
They do. I think it's just a matter of changing one hole spacing and getting feedback. Also the Welsh Government is paying for approvals. Carwyn and 3DCrowd are now fully engaged (M-Sparc and 3DCrowd SOPs are merging) and we have the potential to put the new variant of the DoES design through with W.G. paying possibly. Basically either Kitronix or DoES designs (possibly both) are going to be CE approved imho. And whatever design is CE approved is the design everybody needs to be laser cutting nationally #BecauseLiability imho |
Spun out of #16
NOTE: This is for the national visor effort, not at this time the internal DoES visor workflow.
3DCrowd have bulk half mm visor shields which can be delivered by them nationally to "local hubs"
These are preferred by doctors to the thinner acetate sheets we are using and more likely to receive NHS approval.
They will be cheaper than anything DoES or other organisations can source themselves due to bulk purchase.
Sourcing 3DCrowd visor shields greatly simplifies the visor workflow as producers only need to make, clean and pack visor bands then forward on with a pack from a stock of pre-made visors shields.
I am receiving enquiries from SMEs and education about how they make these visors and how they source the materials. I intend to support them in this effort.
To leverage the die-cut visor design the laser-cut band design needs to conform to the Prusa RC3 standard, which the current iteration does not. My understanding is this is just changing hole spacing.
Can somebody help me with this? @huffeec ? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: