Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request - covering missing setting volume 2 #2

Open
canope-25 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #4
Open

Feature request - covering missing setting volume 2 #2

canope-25 opened this issue Nov 1, 2024 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #4

Comments

@canope-25
Copy link

Hi , thank you for your help and reactivity !
Regarding the temp setting I mentioned , it's not the same setting:

This one is the local deviation :

image

The other one is related to the eco mode and define hysteresis to us.
It's normally by 0.5 degre C but can be adapted in order to take account the local context :

image

Thank you in advance for your help

@canope-25 canope-25 changed the title Feature request - covering missing setting vol2 Feature request - covering missing setting volume 2 Nov 1, 2024
@canope-25
Copy link
Author

Hi, regarding the hysteresis setting.

Maybe the issue is related to the fact that the datapoints sent by the device don't contain that part.
It's maybe something that need to be sent by zb2m with the right datapoint id ?

Regards

@lowczy
Copy link

lowczy commented Nov 24, 2024

Here you have official announcement for this model https://www.moestech.com/blogs/news/ztrv-801

Device identification
Device name:LCD Smart Thermostatic Radiator Valve
Device model:WTRV-PJ-801/ZTRV-PJ-801

MOES-TRV-801.pdf

@DonaldChung-HK
Copy link
Owner

I think the data is exposed, the id should be 115

@DonaldChung-HK DonaldChung-HK linked a pull request Nov 25, 2024 that will close this issue
@DonaldChung-HK
Copy link
Owner

DonaldChung-HK commented Nov 25, 2024

I put it in branch cause I don't have time to test it and I am not using it feel free to try it out if needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants