You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am doing some optimization and had an idea for an improvement.
If you e.g. think of an optimization where you set magnet height and magnet width (by pole coverage from 0 to 1) and want to maintain the airgap, then you got design variable that are coupled somehow and could not be set with independent functions. (You got to e.g. iterate yoke diameters, magnet width in mm and so on.)
Therefore (to do no fancy tricks :-) ) an intermediate storeage somewhere in simu or machine would be great.
So do you mind if I introduce a property user_dict to Simu class for that purpose?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
I am doing some optimization and had an idea for an improvement.
If you e.g. think of an optimization where you set magnet height and magnet width (by pole coverage from 0 to 1) and want to maintain the airgap, then you got design variable that are coupled somehow and could not be set with independent functions. (You got to e.g. iterate yoke diameters, magnet width in mm and so on.)
Therefore (to do no fancy tricks :-) ) an intermediate storeage somewhere in simu or machine would be great.
So do you mind if I introduce a property user_dict to Simu class for that purpose?
Best regards, Sebastian
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions