Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why MaskedTransformer achieve better result than vqvae? #81

Open
FufenNan opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Why MaskedTransformer achieve better result than vqvae? #81

FufenNan opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@FufenNan
Copy link

Thanks for sharing your excellent work.
I'm trying to replicate the results but encountered some problems. According to your code, the MaskedTransformer predicts the base tokens encoded by VQVAE, and it has no relation to the residual. My VQVAE without the residual layer only achieves an FID score of 0.2, while my MaskedTransformer achieves 0.09. This is really confusing for me since the MaskedTransformer learns from VQVAE but shows better performance.
Could you explain why this happens?

@Murrol
Copy link
Collaborator

Murrol commented Oct 29, 2024

This is interesting. It might be because the encoder of the vqvae is not converged properly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants