Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review and re-add coverage calculation #13

Open
kweav opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Review and re-add coverage calculation #13

kweav opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@kweav
Copy link
Collaborator

kweav commented Feb 8, 2024

Issue Description

Coverage calculation used a hardcoded value not equal to the number of lines in the input file and so a more thorough review of the calculation in its original context needs to be undertaken in order to understand how to make a generalizable formula.

Inputs

For the desired generalizable function, the input should be a read count matrix where the number of samples is the number of columns and the number of paired guides is the number of rows. Alternatively, the reworked code used a counts_per_sample which sums the number of reads across the paired guides for each sample column.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant