You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thank you for your great work on this project. I have a couple of questions regarding the reproduction of Figure 8 (Learning curves of affinity scores where the red dashed line represents the threshold):
When reproducing the grouped results in Figure 8, should the hyperparameters be set according to the default parameters in the add_args function in utils.py or according to the parameters provided in molgroup/scripts/dataset_grouping.sh?
Additionally, I have a question about line 476 in molgroup/app/train_molgroup.py. The comment mentions "# get the index of gate with the score not higher than 0.4", which seems to suggest that only tasks with gate_scores not higher than 0.4 are retained. However, the paper mentions that in each round, auxiliary datasets with affinity scores lower than 0.6 are removed. Is this difference due to a distinction between the definitions of gate_scores and affinity scores?
Thank you for your assistance!
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
First of all, thank you for your great work on this project. I have a couple of questions regarding the reproduction of Figure 8 (Learning curves of affinity scores where the red dashed line represents the threshold):
When reproducing the grouped results in Figure 8, should the hyperparameters be set according to the default parameters in the add_args function in utils.py or according to the parameters provided in molgroup/scripts/dataset_grouping.sh?
Additionally, I have a question about line 476 in molgroup/app/train_molgroup.py. The comment mentions "# get the index of gate with the score not higher than 0.4", which seems to suggest that only tasks with gate_scores not higher than 0.4 are retained. However, the paper mentions that in each round, auxiliary datasets with affinity scores lower than 0.6 are removed. Is this difference due to a distinction between the definitions of gate_scores and affinity scores?
Thank you for your assistance!
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: