-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Variant idea: Double red (dark with no bdr) #2961
Comments
Sounds fun, who's gonna code it up? :) |
If people approve, I could try when I have time. But I'd appreciate a little help from someone that knowns the code to start, since I never touched it |
FWIW that's significantly easier than dark. "efficiency + pace" is not the same as "difficulty" |
That's true. It is easier enough that I though a 6s "triple double" is feasable. It would br a 1 off similar to mixes |
Similar to part of #2608 |
Thx. It seemed too simple of an idea for no-one else to have thought about it. I think the dark version is the most interesting so I wouldn't bother adding the simple 6 4 4 4 2 and the double dark 2 2 2 2 2 versions. |
I have got an idea for a variant that has dark difficutily but no bdrs on turn 1.
I thought of calling it double red (but it can be double rainbow, white, brown, pink etc.).
In practice the double suit is composed of 1111 222 333 444 55 and two stacks of that same suit have to be made.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: