Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Codelist LithologyValue parents translation to PT is wrong #46

Open
auretepereira opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Codelist LithologyValue parents translation to PT is wrong #46

auretepereira opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
under analysis A first analysis is being performed

Comments

@auretepereira
Copy link

Hi
I suggest to correct the translation to PT of every parent values on codelists LithologyValue related to Geology Theme.

I think that errors were made at that time when the translations to PT were made available.

See for instance:

URI
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/LithologyValue/phyllite
This version
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/LithologyValue/phyllite:1
Label
filito
Definition
Rock with a well developed, continuous schistosity, an average grain size between 0.1 and 0.5 millimeters, and a silvery sheen on cleavage surfaces. Individual phyllosilicate grains are barely visible with the unaided eye.
Collection
Litologia
Parent
sienitóide feldspatóidico

The URI for parent value is all right but the translation of foliatedMetamorphicRock to sienitóide feldspatóidico is wrong.

Regards

Aurete

@arantzaetxebarria
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear @auretepereira

Thanks for reporting the issue,
We will analyse your change proposal. We will keep you informed about it.

Regards,

@arantzaetxebarria arantzaetxebarria added the under analysis A first analysis is being performed label Jan 12, 2023
@arantzaetxebarria arantzaetxebarria self-assigned this Jan 12, 2023
@KathiSchleidt
Copy link

While not on the PT translation, the English content of the LithologyValue Codelist are not in line with those originally proposed in the data model, captured in the IR. Seem to have come from elsewhere, as not Lithology (values like sewage sludge). This was already reported in a different thread, but was not possible to find. Please investigate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
under analysis A first analysis is being performed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants