You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We encounter a problem when we try to follow the layernamestandard in the data specification,
we do not think that the layers we have in our service are correct agree with the layernames defined in the data specification.
Our service contains these layers:
"Terränglutning" = Terrain slope
"Terrängskuggning" = hill shading
How can we best match with these layersnames?
best regards, Sebastian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear @sebros123
in case the data has been harmonised, you have to use the name of related spatial data object type. However, keep in mind that according to endorsed change in Req. 39 of the View Service TG "The layer name can be “as is”, in case the data served are not harmonised according to [INS DS]". The idea being discussed and already implemented for testing in the staging instance of the Validator - see issue #39 - is that a harmonised View service can serve both as-is and harmonised data, only the latter being obliged to follow the IR naming rules. The Validator will then check for the presence of at least one layer with conforming name.
Hope this helps
Hi,
We encounter a problem when we try to follow the layernamestandard in the data specification,
we do not think that the layers we have in our service are correct agree with the layernames defined in the data specification.
Our service contains these layers:
"Terränglutning" = Terrain slope
"Terrängskuggning" = hill shading
How can we best match with these layersnames?
best regards, Sebastian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: