You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a requirement where I am suppose to zoom an image upto 200% of its maximum resolution. The default behaviour doesn't allow beyond 100%. I couldn't find any configuration to change the same.
So, if, for eg. I have an SM modality whole slide image with 7 levels - I can zoom in to the last level, but not able to digitally zoom beyond that.
So, would like to know if there is any option to digitally zoom beyond the base image resolution if we want to?
Can give more details if required to understand the requirement better.
Apologies, if there is any mistake in the framing of the question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While you can't zoom indefinitely in OpenLayers, you can set a high maxZoom level that allows for extensive zooming in. However, the actual zooming experience is limited by the underlying data source and how it serves tiles at those zoom levels. You can try implementing a vector layer on your side https://openlayers.org/en/latest/examples/vector-layer.html
Instead of relying on raster tiles, use vector layers (like GeoJSON or vector tiles). Vector data can be rendered at any scale without losing quality, which gives the illusion of indefinite zooming but that's a different implementation.
I have a requirement where I am suppose to zoom an image upto 200% of its maximum resolution. The default behaviour doesn't allow beyond 100%. I couldn't find any configuration to change the same.
So, if, for eg. I have an SM modality whole slide image with 7 levels - I can zoom in to the last level, but not able to digitally zoom beyond that.
So, would like to know if there is any option to digitally zoom beyond the base image resolution if we want to?
Can give more details if required to understand the requirement better.
Apologies, if there is any mistake in the framing of the question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: