.. automodule:: torch.optim
To use :mod:`torch.optim` you have to construct an optimizer object that will hold the current state and will update the parameters based on the computed gradients.
To construct an :class:`Optimizer` you have to give it an iterable containing the parameters (all should be :class:`~torch.autograd.Variable` s) to optimize. Then, you can specify optimizer-specific options such as the learning rate, weight decay, etc.
Example:
optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=0.01, momentum=0.9) optimizer = optim.Adam([var1, var2], lr=0.0001)
:class:`Optimizer` s also support specifying per-parameter options. To do this, instead
of passing an iterable of :class:`~torch.autograd.Variable` s, pass in an iterable of
:class:`dict` s. Each of them will define a separate parameter group, and should contain
a params
key, containing a list of parameters belonging to it. Other keys
should match the keyword arguments accepted by the optimizers, and will be used
as optimization options for this group.
For example, this is very useful when one wants to specify per-layer learning rates:
optim.SGD([ {'params': model.base.parameters(), 'lr': 1e-2}, {'params': model.classifier.parameters()} ], lr=1e-3, momentum=0.9)
This means that model.base
's parameters will use a learning rate of 1e-2
, whereas
model.classifier
's parameters will stick to the default learning rate of 1e-3
.
Finally a momentum of 0.9
will be used for all parameters.
Note
You can still pass options as keyword arguments. They will be used as defaults, in the groups that didn't override them. This is useful when you only want to vary a single option, while keeping all others consistent between parameter groups.
Also consider the following example related to the distinct penalization of parameters. Remember that :func:`~torch.nn.Module.parameters` returns an iterable that contains all learnable parameters, including biases and other parameters that may prefer distinct penalization. To address this, one can specify individual penalization weights for each parameter group:
bias_params = [p for name, p in self.named_parameters() if 'bias' in name] others = [p for name, p in self.named_parameters() if 'bias' not in name] optim.SGD([ {'params': others}, {'params': bias_params, 'weight_decay': 0} ], weight_decay=1e-2, lr=1e-2)
In this manner, bias terms are isolated from non-bias terms, and a weight_decay
of 0
is set specifically for the bias terms, as to avoid any penalization for
this group.
All optimizers implement a :func:`~Optimizer.step` method, that updates the parameters. It can be used in two ways:
This is a simplified version supported by most optimizers. The function can be called once the gradients are computed using e.g. :func:`~torch.autograd.Variable.backward`.
Example:
for input, target in dataset: optimizer.zero_grad() output = model(input) loss = loss_fn(output, target) loss.backward() optimizer.step()
Some optimization algorithms such as Conjugate Gradient and LBFGS need to reevaluate the function multiple times, so you have to pass in a closure that allows them to recompute your model. The closure should clear the gradients, compute the loss, and return it.
Example:
for input, target in dataset: def closure(): optimizer.zero_grad() output = model(input) loss = loss_fn(output, target) loss.backward() return loss optimizer.step(closure)
.. autoclass:: Optimizer
.. autosummary:: :toctree: generated :nosignatures: Optimizer.add_param_group Optimizer.load_state_dict Optimizer.register_load_state_dict_pre_hook Optimizer.register_load_state_dict_post_hook Optimizer.state_dict Optimizer.register_state_dict_pre_hook Optimizer.register_state_dict_post_hook Optimizer.step Optimizer.register_step_pre_hook Optimizer.register_step_post_hook Optimizer.zero_grad
.. autosummary:: :toctree: generated :nosignatures: Adadelta Adafactor Adagrad Adam AdamW SparseAdam Adamax ASGD LBFGS NAdam RAdam RMSprop Rprop SGD
Many of our algorithms have various implementations optimized for performance, readability and/or generality, so we attempt to default to the generally fastest implementation for the current device if no particular implementation has been specified by the user.
We have 3 major categories of implementations: for-loop, foreach (multi-tensor), and fused. The most straightforward implementations are for-loops over the parameters with big chunks of computation. For-looping is usually slower than our foreach implementations, which combine parameters into a multi-tensor and run the big chunks of computation all at once, thereby saving many sequential kernel calls. A few of our optimizers have even faster fused implementations, which fuse the big chunks of computation into one kernel. We can think of foreach implementations as fusing horizontally and fused implementations as fusing vertically on top of that.
In general, the performance ordering of the 3 implementations is fused > foreach > for-loop. So when applicable, we default to foreach over for-loop. Applicable means the foreach implementation is available, the user has not specified any implementation-specific kwargs (e.g., fused, foreach, differentiable), and all tensors are native. Note that while fused should be even faster than foreach, the implementations are newer and we would like to give them more bake-in time before flipping the switch everywhere. We summarize the stability status for each implementation on the second table below, you are welcome to try them out though!
Below is a table showing the available and default implementations of each algorithm:
Algorithm | Default | Has foreach? | Has fused? |
---|---|---|---|
:class:`Adadelta` | foreach | yes | no |
:class:`Adafactor` | for-loop | no | no |
:class:`Adagrad` | foreach | yes | yes (cpu only) |
:class:`Adam` | foreach | yes | yes |
:class:`AdamW` | foreach | yes | yes |
:class:`SparseAdam` | for-loop | no | no |
:class:`Adamax` | foreach | yes | no |
:class:`ASGD` | foreach | yes | no |
:class:`LBFGS` | for-loop | no | no |
:class:`NAdam` | foreach | yes | no |
:class:`RAdam` | foreach | yes | no |
:class:`RMSprop` | foreach | yes | no |
:class:`Rprop` | foreach | yes | no |
:class:`SGD` | foreach | yes | yes |
Below table is showing the stability status for fused implementations:
Algorithm | CPU | CUDA | MPS |
---|---|---|---|
:class:`Adadelta` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`Adafactor` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`Adagrad` | beta | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`Adam` | beta | stable | beta |
:class:`AdamW` | beta | stable | beta |
:class:`SparseAdam` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`Adamax` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`ASGD` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`LBFGS` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`NAdam` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`RAdam` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`RMSprop` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`Rprop` | unsupported | unsupported | unsupported |
:class:`SGD` | beta | beta | beta |
:mod:`torch.optim.lr_scheduler` provides several methods to adjust the learning rate based on the number of epochs. :class:`torch.optim.lr_scheduler.ReduceLROnPlateau` allows dynamic learning rate reducing based on some validation measurements.
Learning rate scheduling should be applied after optimizer's update; e.g., you should write your code this way:
Example:
optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=0.01, momentum=0.9) scheduler = ExponentialLR(optimizer, gamma=0.9) for epoch in range(20): for input, target in dataset: optimizer.zero_grad() output = model(input) loss = loss_fn(output, target) loss.backward() optimizer.step() scheduler.step()
Most learning rate schedulers can be called back-to-back (also referred to as chaining schedulers). The result is that each scheduler is applied one after the other on the learning rate obtained by the one preceding it.
Example:
optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=0.01, momentum=0.9) scheduler1 = ExponentialLR(optimizer, gamma=0.9) scheduler2 = MultiStepLR(optimizer, milestones=[30,80], gamma=0.1) for epoch in range(20): for input, target in dataset: optimizer.zero_grad() output = model(input) loss = loss_fn(output, target) loss.backward() optimizer.step() scheduler1.step() scheduler2.step()
In many places in the documentation, we will use the following template to refer to schedulers algorithms.
>>> scheduler = ... >>> for epoch in range(100): >>> train(...) >>> validate(...) >>> scheduler.step()
Warning
Prior to PyTorch 1.1.0, the learning rate scheduler was expected to be called before
the optimizer's update; 1.1.0 changed this behavior in a BC-breaking way. If you use
the learning rate scheduler (calling scheduler.step()
) before the optimizer's update
(calling optimizer.step()
), this will skip the first value of the learning rate schedule.
If you are unable to reproduce results after upgrading to PyTorch 1.1.0, please check
if you are calling scheduler.step()
at the wrong time.
.. autosummary:: :toctree: generated :nosignatures: lr_scheduler.LambdaLR lr_scheduler.MultiplicativeLR lr_scheduler.StepLR lr_scheduler.MultiStepLR lr_scheduler.ConstantLR lr_scheduler.LinearLR lr_scheduler.ExponentialLR lr_scheduler.PolynomialLR lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR lr_scheduler.ChainedScheduler lr_scheduler.SequentialLR lr_scheduler.ReduceLROnPlateau lr_scheduler.CyclicLR lr_scheduler.OneCycleLR lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts
:mod:`torch.optim.swa_utils` implements Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA) and Exponential Moving Average (EMA). In particular, the :class:`torch.optim.swa_utils.AveragedModel` class implements SWA and EMA models, :class:`torch.optim.swa_utils.SWALR` implements the SWA learning rate scheduler and :func:`torch.optim.swa_utils.update_bn` is a utility function used to update SWA/EMA batch normalization statistics at the end of training.
SWA has been proposed in Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalization.
EMA is a widely known technique to reduce the training time by reducing the number of weight updates needed. It is a variation of Polyak averaging, but using exponential weights instead of equal weights across iterations.
The AveragedModel class serves to compute the weights of the SWA or EMA model.
You can create an SWA averaged model by running:
>>> averaged_model = AveragedModel(model)
EMA models are constructed by specifying the multi_avg_fn
argument as follows:
>>> decay = 0.999
>>> averaged_model = AveragedModel(model, multi_avg_fn=get_ema_multi_avg_fn(decay))
Decay is a parameter between 0 and 1 that controls how fast the averaged parameters are decayed. If not provided to get_ema_multi_avg_fn
, the default is 0.999.
get_ema_multi_avg_fn
returns a function that applies the following EMA equation to the weights:
W^\textrm{EMA}_{t+1} = \alpha W^\textrm{EMA}_{t} + (1 - \alpha) W^\textrm{model}_t
where alpha is the EMA decay.
Here the model model
can be an arbitrary :class:`torch.nn.Module` object. averaged_model
will keep track of the running averages of the parameters of the model
. To update these
averages, you should use the :func:`update_parameters` function after the optimizer.step():
>>> averaged_model.update_parameters(model)
For SWA and EMA, this call is usually done right after the optimizer step()
. In the case of SWA, this is usually skipped for some numbers of steps at the beginning of the training.
By default, :class:`torch.optim.swa_utils.AveragedModel` computes a running equal average of
the parameters that you provide, but you can also use custom averaging functions with the
avg_fn
or multi_avg_fn
parameters:
avg_fn
allows defining a function operating on each parameter tuple (averaged parameter, model parameter) and should return the new averaged parameter.multi_avg_fn
allows defining more efficient operations acting on a tuple of parameter lists, (averaged parameter list, model parameter list), at the same time, for example using thetorch._foreach*
functions. This function must update the averaged parameters in-place.
In the following example ema_model
computes an exponential moving average using the avg_fn
parameter:
>>> ema_avg = lambda averaged_model_parameter, model_parameter, num_averaged:\
>>> 0.9 * averaged_model_parameter + 0.1 * model_parameter
>>> ema_model = torch.optim.swa_utils.AveragedModel(model, avg_fn=ema_avg)
In the following example ema_model
computes an exponential moving average using the more efficient multi_avg_fn
parameter:
>>> ema_model = AveragedModel(model, multi_avg_fn=get_ema_multi_avg_fn(0.9))
Typically, in SWA the learning rate is set to a high constant value. :class:`SWALR` is a learning rate scheduler that anneals the learning rate to a fixed value, and then keeps it constant. For example, the following code creates a scheduler that linearly anneals the learning rate from its initial value to 0.05 in 5 epochs within each parameter group:
>>> swa_scheduler = torch.optim.swa_utils.SWALR(optimizer, \
>>> anneal_strategy="linear", anneal_epochs=5, swa_lr=0.05)
You can also use cosine annealing to a fixed value instead of linear annealing by setting
anneal_strategy="cos"
.
:func:`update_bn` is a utility function that allows to compute the batchnorm statistics for the SWA model
on a given dataloader loader
at the end of training:
>>> torch.optim.swa_utils.update_bn(loader, swa_model)
:func:`update_bn` applies the swa_model
to every element in the dataloader and computes the activation
statistics for each batch normalization layer in the model.
Warning
:func:`update_bn` assumes that each batch in the dataloader loader
is either a tensors or a list of
tensors where the first element is the tensor that the network swa_model
should be applied to.
If your dataloader has a different structure, you can update the batch normalization statistics of the
swa_model
by doing a forward pass with the swa_model
on each element of the dataset.
In the example below, swa_model
is the SWA model that accumulates the averages of the weights.
We train the model for a total of 300 epochs and we switch to the SWA learning rate schedule
and start to collect SWA averages of the parameters at epoch 160:
>>> loader, optimizer, model, loss_fn = ...
>>> swa_model = torch.optim.swa_utils.AveragedModel(model)
>>> scheduler = torch.optim.lr_scheduler.CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max=300)
>>> swa_start = 160
>>> swa_scheduler = SWALR(optimizer, swa_lr=0.05)
>>>
>>> for epoch in range(300):
>>> for input, target in loader:
>>> optimizer.zero_grad()
>>> loss_fn(model(input), target).backward()
>>> optimizer.step()
>>> if epoch > swa_start:
>>> swa_model.update_parameters(model)
>>> swa_scheduler.step()
>>> else:
>>> scheduler.step()
>>>
>>> # Update bn statistics for the swa_model at the end
>>> torch.optim.swa_utils.update_bn(loader, swa_model)
>>> # Use swa_model to make predictions on test data
>>> preds = swa_model(test_input)
In the example below, ema_model
is the EMA model that accumulates the exponentially-decayed averages of the weights with a decay rate of 0.999.
We train the model for a total of 300 epochs and start to collect EMA averages immediately.
>>> loader, optimizer, model, loss_fn = ...
>>> ema_model = torch.optim.swa_utils.AveragedModel(model, \
>>> multi_avg_fn=torch.optim.swa_utils.get_ema_multi_avg_fn(0.999))
>>>
>>> for epoch in range(300):
>>> for input, target in loader:
>>> optimizer.zero_grad()
>>> loss_fn(model(input), target).backward()
>>> optimizer.step()
>>> ema_model.update_parameters(model)
>>>
>>> # Update bn statistics for the ema_model at the end
>>> torch.optim.swa_utils.update_bn(loader, ema_model)
>>> # Use ema_model to make predictions on test data
>>> preds = ema_model(test_input)
.. py:module:: torch.optim.adadelta
.. py:module:: torch.optim.adagrad
.. py:module:: torch.optim.adam
.. py:module:: torch.optim.adamax
.. py:module:: torch.optim.adamw
.. py:module:: torch.optim.asgd
.. py:module:: torch.optim.lbfgs
.. py:module:: torch.optim.lr_scheduler
.. py:module:: torch.optim.nadam
.. py:module:: torch.optim.optimizer
.. py:module:: torch.optim.radam
.. py:module:: torch.optim.rmsprop
.. py:module:: torch.optim.rprop
.. py:module:: torch.optim.sgd
.. py:module:: torch.optim.sparse_adam
.. py:module:: torch.optim.swa_utils