You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have an inquiry about the performance measurement method for the NSDTSEA (VCTK+DEMAND) data set published in the paper.
I think you measured MOS-LQO and not PESQ. Many open source codes convert the measurement results of WB PESQ into MOS-LQO and export them. So the range of values is not -0.5 to 4.5 as you wrote in your paper.
My own measurements on the same dataset show that the PESQ is 1.68. For MOS-LQO it measures 1.97 as shown in your paper. The remaining CSIG, CBAK, and COVL were measured in the same way as in the paper.
I would appreciate it if you could confirm that your pesq metric is correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have an inquiry about the performance measurement method for the NSDTSEA (VCTK+DEMAND) data set published in the paper.
I think you measured MOS-LQO and not PESQ. Many open source codes convert the measurement results of WB PESQ into MOS-LQO and export them. So the range of values is not -0.5 to 4.5 as you wrote in your paper.
My own measurements on the same dataset show that the PESQ is 1.68. For MOS-LQO it measures 1.97 as shown in your paper. The remaining CSIG, CBAK, and COVL were measured in the same way as in the paper.
I would appreciate it if you could confirm that your pesq metric is correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: