-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Julia-style kwargs? #12
Comments
Schermopname.2022-02-13.om.17.19.02.mov |
Nice!
I agree. Essentially I had no time to think about a better API, OTOH I wanted to be able to expose the full functionality of Triangle. For higher level focused on PDE triangulations I created SimplexGridFactory.jl
I would hesitate to draw in GeometryBasics here (IMHO it is not very well documented, in particular for meshes, and I didn't really get the design), so I would vote for The authors of Triangle.jl and TriangleMesh.jl (I am mentioning these in the README) have higher level APIs, which don't cover the full functionality of Triangle though . Also, they don't use the jll (just noticed them about the existence...). I contacted them before I created this package, but we didn't went very far in our conversation, and I needed functionality for the lecture (you remember...) which they didn't cover... |
Really cool! I'm using this package to play around with generative art for my pen plotter 😎
One thing that I was thinking: I have not used the original CLI program before, so this API:
would be more natural than the current API (example from docs):
What do you think?
More generally, a more high-level API (without
IO
, withGeometryBasics
orVector{SVector{Float64,2}}
input/output instead ofMatrix
) would be nice to make this package slightly easier to use for my purposes (very small number of points, sunday afternoon entertainment). I already wrote some functions that I can turn into a PR if you like!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: