Institutional page

[Grizzly127]

Issue to document the institutional design development

This was the latest version for the institutional page:

following steps are:

• how to edit the page, I have one draft here
• how to add members or how institutions are organized in general: does one own a institution and can add members? Or can multiple persons own one institution? (see draft for adding members for example)
• how to build an institutional page? do you have a private profile first and from there a user can build an institutional page? or is it a decision at the registration process? (see suggestion for profile page settings)

private profile page:

settings and creating an institutional page:

@lozanaross @ZetOE

[Grizzly127]

Collection management

I looked into how other platforms like Sketchfab, Pinterest or instagram manage their collections. There collections is always a separated part from the individual objects. In Sketchfab the division looks like that:

In pinterest it is separated in "Erstellt" - Created content and "Gemerkt" - Content that you added to one of your collections.

I think it makes sense to also separate the collections in the profile/Institution page and then the filter options on the side change. I think in the explore page, it can stay as it is.
We could use the following division:
My objects - Objects uploaded by the user
My collections - Collections created by the user
Subscribed collections - Collections the user subscribed to/ is following
Liked objects- Objects that are liked by the user

What do you think about it? Do you have more ideas or suggestions?
@HeyItsBATMAN @lozanaross @ZetOE

[Grizzly127]

Since the participants from the workshop mentioned that the filter options for objects/collections are a bit too abstract, here again the idea to switch between different tabs like suggested above.
We can still change the subscribed collections/Liked objects if we don't want to use this feature.
What do you think?
@lozanaross @ZetOE

[Grizzly127]

Improvement for the settings form

This is the newest version of the formular to create an institutional page:

• we call it "page name" since there can also be project pages created
• In Category there can be chosen between museum, research institute, university, library, funded project, project, other
• if user chooses it's a project -> new field for adding the organisation/institution, Link or only text field. Smart search for existing institutional pages. (I am not sure about this point yet. The field for adding the organization/institution is for linking an organization to a project, right? the user can only type in the name of an organization or add a link or link an existing institutional page. This is not finished design/text wise, but just for functionality, is this going in to the direction we want?

• first two fields are mandatory, the rest is optional
• Collaborators don't get specific roles

@ZetOE @lozanaross

[Grizzly127]

institutional page perspective, user, not member

filter options, search bar, tabs
This is the perspective for an institutional/project page:

• since we got rid of most of the filter options, we only have the filter for media types left right now.
• the search bar can go more on top to the tabs section

display members/collaborators

• we can display members/collaborators in a new tab or below the profile picture, since we don't have the feature to follow institutions yet.

I prefer the second option, because the members are not similar to objects and collections, it's another category. and if it is a new tab, there is a lot of space on the page, only for the list of names.
The user could be able to click on the number of members below the profile picture and get a new smaller window to see all the collaborators:

@ZetOE @lozanaross

[Grizzly127]

institutional page perspective, user as member and rights to edit

user is able to edit the page and members

• if the user is a member of the organization, there is an edit button.
• when the user clicks on "edit profile", the fields become editable textfields again. I don't like the idea to add "edit" next to every field like in wikibase.
• and if the user clicks on the members, he can also edit them here.

• I think I also still like the option to get back to the settings menu and get the same form like when creating the page.
• Here could also be the possibility to view the members and edit them and we could add more settings in the future if we need more.
• This is the settings menu from the institutional/project page:

• If it is integrated in the profile page for example, here could be the place to edit username/password as well.
• This is the idea for the place where to create an institutional page right now and if the user can edit their profile here, it makes sense, that the project/institutional profile is editable in the same way.
• This is the settings menu from a personal profile:

@lozanaross @ZetOE