-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature] Refactor file structure #43
Comments
I wanted to do the src folder for a long time and then never got around to doing it. The problem is moving the config to a separate folder would be a breaking change and it would require either specifying --config option or changing the default location. |
We don't have to require the config file on a different location, the folder is purely to contain the templates. Users will still need to create (or have it prebundled in releases) the config files on the same folders |
To add to this, if it was a Node/NPM project you would be able to just create a command to automatically build it :P I don't know if PIP can do that, but we can just create an bash script for development to automatically build, copy the config template and bundle everything. |
Closing this issue as completed since PR #72 has been opened. For contributors: Please rebase your PRs to match the new paths, before submitting them. |
The project currently has a lot of files that are generally unorganized and messy. They make sense due to proper naming by Poro but we should organize things a little.
Proposing this file structure:
This isn't the best structure, frankly the current is just fine, but I believe if we can organize the project better and with subfolders, developing and maintaining it will become a piece of cake.
This shouldn't affect the end user as they download the build version anyways, but rather developers that wish to jump in the project, so it's definitely beneficial!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: