You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we have to pass say fillCache and asBuffer options from JS to C++, it's faster to pass those as boolean arguments, rather than a { fillCache, asBuffer } object.
In cases where we can't replace use of options objects, we can still optimize that, by replacing napi_has_named_property() and napi_get_named_property() with just one napi_get_named_property() call and checking if the return value is napi_ok.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If we have to pass say
fillCache
andasBuffer
options from JS to C++, it's faster to pass those as boolean arguments, rather than a{ fillCache, asBuffer }
object.In cases where we can't replace use of options objects, we can still optimize that, by replacing
napi_has_named_property()
andnapi_get_named_property()
with just onenapi_get_named_property()
call and checking if the return value isnapi_ok
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: