You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@meier-rene,
In some cases, we need formulas in brackets, e.g. for charged compounds such as quaternary ammonia compounds. The validator needs to be fixed to handle such cases.
Formula from CH$IUPAC: [C27H42NO2]+
Formula from CH$FORMULA: C27H42NO2
I suggest to check the inner formula only and to ignore the brackets.
Best wishes,
Tobias
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
PubChem handle charged formulas differently, without the brackets, just the charge afterwards. I don't recall seeing a charged formula with square brackets before, how are you producing them?
The formulas are created by cdk that way. I think its smart. The syntax for charged molecules in cdk is [Formula]Charge. This is a non ambiguous notation. Just consider a sulfate ion: [SO4]2- compared to SO42-. This means we have a incompatibility between java(CDK) and R. How can we solve that?
@meier-rene,
In some cases, we need formulas in brackets, e.g. for charged compounds such as quaternary ammonia compounds. The validator needs to be fixed to handle such cases.
I suggest to check the inner formula only and to ignore the brackets.
Best wishes,
Tobias
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: