We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
您好,对您这个工作非常的感兴趣,但是对于这里面的randomscale有些疑问,对于cityscapes你paper写的是(0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, 0.625, 0.75, 0.875, 1.0, 1.125, 1.25, 1.375, 1.5),我想知道一下为什么会选择0.125,0.25.。。。。。0.625等着吗小的一些尺度?但是对于camVID的尺度就相对大一些,这个是有什么原因吗?因为一般cityscapes大家不会用这么小的尺度。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
因为我这边输入小,为了保证cityscapes0.5scale模型的精度,所以对应的数据增强的尺度也做得比较小;camvid的话因为用的是原始分辨率,所以尺度就相对大一些
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
您好,对您这个工作非常的感兴趣,但是对于这里面的randomscale有些疑问,对于cityscapes你paper写的是(0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, 0.625, 0.75, 0.875, 1.0, 1.125, 1.25, 1.375, 1.5),我想知道一下为什么会选择0.125,0.25.。。。。。0.625等着吗小的一些尺度?但是对于camVID的尺度就相对大一些,这个是有什么原因吗?因为一般cityscapes大家不会用这么小的尺度。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: