You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In our development workflow, we've adopted the use of the auto_route package for handling routing and navigation within our Flutter application. As a team, we work on different branches simultaneously to develop and enhance various features. One significant challenge we're facing is the emergence of merge conflicts in the auto-generated files by the auto_route package when we attempt to merge branches that introduce new routes.
The auto-generated files, crucial for proper routing in our application, seem to clash during the merging process. This leads to conflicts that need to be addressed manually, disrupting the otherwise smooth integration of changes from different branches. These conflicts are not only time-consuming to resolve but also prone to human error, posing a potential risk to the stability of our application.
We're seeking insights and experiences from the community to better understand how other teams have tackled similar challenges. Whether it's adopting specific branching strategies, leveraging version control features, or employing custom scripts, we want to explore effective solutions to mitigate or automate the resolution of auto_route package-related merge conflicts. Your contributions to this discussion can help us collectively navigate and overcome this obstacle, fostering a more streamlined development process for all.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
In our development workflow, we've adopted the use of the auto_route package for handling routing and navigation within our Flutter application. As a team, we work on different branches simultaneously to develop and enhance various features. One significant challenge we're facing is the emergence of merge conflicts in the auto-generated files by the auto_route package when we attempt to merge branches that introduce new routes.
The auto-generated files, crucial for proper routing in our application, seem to clash during the merging process. This leads to conflicts that need to be addressed manually, disrupting the otherwise smooth integration of changes from different branches. These conflicts are not only time-consuming to resolve but also prone to human error, posing a potential risk to the stability of our application.
We're seeking insights and experiences from the community to better understand how other teams have tackled similar challenges. Whether it's adopting specific branching strategies, leveraging version control features, or employing custom scripts, we want to explore effective solutions to mitigate or automate the resolution of auto_route package-related merge conflicts. Your contributions to this discussion can help us collectively navigate and overcome this obstacle, fostering a more streamlined development process for all.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions