Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: without stretching, does the grid need to rotate? #361

Open
weiyuan-jiang opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@weiyuan-jiang
Copy link

The "stretched_grid" is set to true when stretch factor is not closed to 1 and do_schmidt is true.

if ( (Atm%flagstruct%do_schmidt .or. Atm%flagstruct%do_cube_transform) .and. abs(atm%flagstruct%stretch_fac-1.) > 1.E-5 ) then
stretched_grid = .true.

But in "direct_transform" or "cube_transform", even the stretch factor is closed to 1 and the grid does not stretch, the grid still rotate any way.

Is this intentional ?

@lharris4
Copy link
Contributor

lharris4 commented Oct 3, 2024

We can always rotate the grid even in the absence of stretching, which is useful for rotating the parent grid and inserting nests. If you wish to run with a standard uniform-resolution global domain, I do strongly recommend setting do_cube_transform = .F.. We are also encouraging people to move away from do_schmidt since that creates a tile 6 that is oriented with south at the "top" of the grid, unlike do_cube_transform for which tile 6 has south at the bottom as we expect.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants