Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We have the major and minor axis diameters at every z height. Refine by considering pod angle at z position. #7

Open
maxf130 opened this issue Jun 18, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@maxf130
Copy link
Contributor

maxf130 commented Jun 18, 2019

We have the major and minor axis diameters at every z height. Using the major axis diameter naively as pod width is probably fine. A refinement:

  1. Calculate the angle of the pod with respect to the central axis of the scanneras a function of z height. This will be two angles, the inclination and the in what direction it is inclined.
  2. Correct the major axis diameter to account for the fact that we are not measuring the minimal distance across the pod.

This would require getting not just major and minor axis diameters, but also their orientation.

Originally posted by @maxf130 in #2 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant