You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
assessment details vs opportunity details (implementation cost/annual energy savings..)
Currently, we allow user to track implementation cost and savings either on assessment level, or down to each EEO level. User might be confused about the difference and how they are connected to better track. Consider implementing some mechanisms for better UX to clear confusion. Need discussion for more ideas.
One example could be: if user put in some numbers on assessment level, at EEO level, says "implementation cost and savings are tracked on assessment level, would you like to add additional cost and savings for this EEO?"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
assessment details vs opportunity details (implementation cost/annual energy savings..)
Currently, we allow user to track implementation cost and savings either on assessment level, or down to each EEO level. User might be confused about the difference and how they are connected to better track. Consider implementing some mechanisms for better UX to clear confusion. Need discussion for more ideas.
One example could be: if user put in some numbers on assessment level, at EEO level, says "implementation cost and savings are tracked on assessment level, would you like to add additional cost and savings for this EEO?"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: