[v2][_commonspeckle] SAXS.py not strictly for XPCS or speckles

[ambarb]

This is for static SAXS analysis as noted by module author. Seems good to keep this in common, but if we stick it in an XPCS repo, I am not sure that it would be under utilized.

Also @danielballan mentioned something about a common scattering repo in previous meetings so I am also asking in this context. We could decide on a two-phase plan regarding this.

  1 """
  2 Sep 10 Developed by Y.G.@CHX 
  3 [email protected]
  4 This module is for the static SAXS analysis, such as fit form factor
  5 """

[ambarb]

Note that the papermill report does indicate each roi's q in Å ^-1 so this module is part of the results pipeline.

• Explicitly document how SAXS.py is integrated into results
• Determine if SAXS.py stays permanently in _commonspeckle or independent scattering repo