Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

StereoDNN Resnet18_2D result is bad, what's the exact factor to get real disparity when model type is resnet18_2d #113

Open
meijia85 opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

StereoDNN Resnet18_2D result is bad, what's the exact factor to get real disparity when model type is resnet18_2d #113

meijia85 opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@meijia85
Copy link

what's the exact factor to get real disparity when model type is resnet18_2d
when use img_f *= w, disparity is smaller than real value. I found img_f *= (w+96) is better, 96 is max disparity.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@meijia85