You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for collecting and making ServerMachineDataset public. While reading this data, I have a small question about interpretation_label:
How does interpretation_label relate to test_label if they are related at all? Why they don't seem to match exactly? For example, the interpretation_label for machine-1-1 indicates that 15849-16368 is an anomaly. However, when checking the test_label for machine-1-1, it indicates that the values at rows 15850-16395 is an anomaly.
Do the indices in interpretation_label also indicate anomaly locations in the train set?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thank you for collecting and making ServerMachineDataset public. While reading this data, I have a small question about
interpretation_label
:How does
interpretation_label
relate totest_label
if they are related at all? Why they don't seem to match exactly? For example, theinterpretation_label
for machine-1-1 indicates that 15849-16368 is an anomaly. However, when checking thetest_label
for machine-1-1, it indicates that the values at rows 15850-16395 is an anomaly.Do the indices in
interpretation_label
also indicate anomaly locations in the train set?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: